Chelsea 3-0 Tottenham: Spurs pay the penalty
By Dan K
Match Analysis

Carlo Ancelotti's Chelsea continued their 100% record in the Premier League following their destruction of London rivals Tottenham Hotspur, with a pretty convincing win. The game didn't match-up to the excitement of the other derby of the day (Manchester United 4-3 Manchester City), but the game did offer some excitement, as well as an interesting performance by the match's referee. It could also prove to be a damning game for Tottenham, who suffered further injuries to an already stretched and depleted central defence.

The Blues moved back to the top of the Premier League and maintained their lead of 3 points over Manchester United, who had grabbed a dramatic and last-gasp winner against City only hours earlier. Six games into the season and it is clear to see that Ancelotti has got his team playing for each other, with passion and determination, and could prove to be the right man to fulfil the dreams of Chelsea owner Roman Abramovic.

But, to Tottenham. Harry Redknapp changed the system of his team in the run up to the match. Still without his favourite midfield man Luka Modric, and up against a Chelsea midfield filled with the likes of Frank Lampard, Michael Ballack and Michael Essien, Redknapp opted to pick a midfield to counter Chelsea's. Jermaine Jenas was named in the starting line-up together with Tom Huddlestone and Wilson Palacious, who formed Tottenham's midfield core. Aaron Lennon and Robbie Keane were pushed onto the wings, with Jermain Defoe the central striker. However, this formation and strategy seemed to limit the width that Tottenham could offer while enabling Chelsea's attacking wing-backs to push forward and really get at their Tottenham counterparts.

Indeed it was former Gunner, and left-back, Ashley Cole who grabbed Chelsea's first just after the half hour mark when he beat a seemingly oblivious Vedran Corluka at the far post to header past Carlo Cudicini in the Tottenham goal. I won't claim that the goal was against the run of play, but up until that point, Spurs had shown themselves to be confident at stroking the ball around and creating some chances. Jermain Defoe should have gotten Tottenham a goal when put cleanly through, but Petr Cech in the Chelsea goal was upto the task.

The 2nd half seemed to be one from hell for Spurs. Firstly, they were denied a clear penalty when Ricardo Carvalho clipped Robbie Keane in the penalty area. Add to that losing both of their center-backs, conceding two further goals, and losing the match, and it's safe to say that Harry Redknapp and Tottenham would have been happy to see the back of Sunday 20th September.

Just 3 minutes after Tottenham's rejected penalty claims, Michael Ballack doubled the lead and made any chance of a Tottenham comeback that much less likely. It came about due to great determination by Frank Lampard to chase the rebound, and his expert comeback was bundled in by the veteran German midfielder (please note Vedran Corluka looking lost after the initial shot). However, yet again, a bad call by the referee has proven to be a game-killer for the Spurs, and Harry Redknapp made that clear in his post-match remarks.

From that point on it seemed to be a question of "how many would Chelsea score?" as opposed to "can Tottenham make a comeback?". Didier Drogba added further insult to injury to the Lilywhites in the 63rd minute and Redknapp seemed unsure or unwilling to make any changes, but had been forced into replacing inspirational figure Ledley King, who pulled up with a hamstring injury in the 48th minute.

Rednapp decided to throw on Peter Crouch after Chelsea's 3rd goal, and Tottenham immediately launched long balls forward to try to capitalise on the tall target man's presence. Crouch did manage to put the ball in the back of the net but the goal was correctly ruled out for offside.

Matters became worse for Spurs in the 82nd minute when Sebastien Bassong thumped his head on the ground after a tussle with Anelka.

Chelsea have not lost at home to Spurs since 1990, and it didn't seem as if it was going to be Tottenham's day on this occasion either. While I don't really want to fall back on criticisms of the referee's performance as a reason for the result, I do believe that Howard Webb mishandled pretty much the entire game. Players from both teams seemed to be overly excited in their challenges, and their was a fair share of man-handling going on. I wouldn't have been suprised if the commentator had informed me that it was a wrestling match and it would have been interesting to see what the impact would have been if there had been the "awesome" extra assistant referees in place.

                          Â

Next up, Spurs travel to Preston in the Carling Cup 3rd round, and Redknapp will most likely be forced into naming some of his squad players and I hope he uses the opportunity to give a run-out to some of the players that have shown some promise. Tottenham's next run of matches in the Premier League will prove to be critical, and the team will need to win agains the likes of Burnley, Bolton, Portsmouth and Sunderland if they are to continue to challenge for a European place in the league.



12  Comments
By  Mani18
21.09.2009 10:20
I saw the game only partially, but Daniel your team average grade for Tottenham of almost 6 is way too high. It seemed to me that there was only really one team on the pitch and that was Chelsea. But after all you are a true Spurs fan :)
By  dank
21.09.2009 10:37
@Mani - appreciate the comments, but Tottenham didn't play badly. They just didn't play well enough. Add the fact that the referee didn't give the crucial decisions at crucial moments in the match, and the fact that Spurs lost both their central defenders, I don' think there is a need to be too harsh on the players.
21.09.2009 10:52
Agree with Dan..It was more of Chelsea playing well and taking there chances than spurs playing bad....I still don't get the logic of Bent out Crouch out....
21.09.2009 11:12
Bent is in Sunderland, so technically he is not out, it seems that for Spurs they once again did not pass the test, the last 2 games were critical in my mind as to what type of team we really have this year, overall score 6-1 against title contenders pretty much shows we are far away from being a title contender. As it stands i would be happy if we finish 6th or 7th. Bottom line is we lack depth, what is worse that we have allot of injury prone players making the situation more serious. Either way i think we had a good run and need to focus on the next few games to get back on course for a top 6 place push
21.09.2009 11:46
Oh just a correction ..I meant Bent out of Spurs and Crouch in ...Never been a fan of Crouch...
By  dank
21.09.2009 12:23
@Michael - I am not the biggest fan of Crouch, but he does provide a good option. And what can I say about Darren Bent?...a player who works hard and gets goals, but it just didnt seem to be a good match at Tottenham. Hopefully Crouch will convince me in the games to come...
By  dank
21.09.2009 12:24
@Chris - Agree with you about our position and how it should go from here. Did you see the game? Agree with my grades?
21.09.2009 13:27
Blame The Celts for all Pen Decisions-lol
By  Gibbo10
22.09.2009 03:48
so how long is Harry going to persist with Keane? he was ineffective going forwards and backwards (penalty (sic) run aside). Starting with Keane screws up any chance we have of beating the big teams as we have two wee guys up front and no defense from midfield on both wings. A luxury you can't afford versus the big 4. Am i the only person out there who thinks Crouch should start for Keane and Kranjcar for Jenas? Would give us more balance and more variety.
By  dank
22.09.2009 07:45
@Neal - I would love to have seen Wenger's reaction to the match if he had been managing that game. Wait, I don't really need to: whinge whinge whinge the whole world is against us. hehe
By  dank
22.09.2009 07:48
@Stephen - Keane has not been magical to say the least, but I like the type of player he is. Crouch offers that target man option, but I don't like the idea of Spurs relying on the long-ball option. Kranjcar hasn't impressed me so far, but then again, he has only played for about 5 minutes since joining. I think HR changed the formation and approach for the game - he wanted to combat Chelsea's midfield 3 (Lamps, Ballack, Essien) and it took away from our wing and forward play.
By  Gibbo10
22.09.2009 23:44
@Dan - i take your point re Harry reshaping to combat their midfield (which did work as all the trouble came from out wide) but i just felt we had no plan B which Crouch gives us. In hindsight i think knocking long balls for Crouch to nod down for defoe would have been our only chance to win that game as we were holding their central midfield quite well. That whole second half Keane was superfluous.
By clicking "Add Comment", you are representing that this entry
does not violate Footbo's Terms of Use.
Add Comment